Data/poincare astrolabe tex#103
Merged
Xinze-Li-Moqian merged 2 commits intoJun 28, 2026
Merged
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
66e36a0
into
feat/poincare-conjecture-challenge
2 checks passed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR rebuilds
projects/poincare-conjecture/.astrolabefrom the Morgan-Tian arXiv TeX source (math/0607607).Scope is data-side only; there are no
web/changes.Changes
tools/poincare_tex_extract.py, a reproducible TeX-to-Astrolabe extractor for the Poincare project.docs-srcMDX filesdocsMDX filesValidation
validate_storepasses.unresolved_refs: {}Notes
The semantic-only graph still has isolated nodes because many source statements do not explicitly cite other statements. Including prose and structural layers connects the full graph.
Definition-use edges are intentionally marked as weak/candidate evidence and should not be treated as strong proof dependencies.