problematic dagworks branding and authors details

[pjfanning]

https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fhamilton+title%3A+DAGWorks&type=code

Many of the matches here are problematic.
To highlight a few that you can search for in this repo yourselves

• const organizationName = "dagworks-inc";
• Why use the DAGWorks platform?
• Co-creator of Hamilton -- with ASF projects/podlings, there is community ownership and referring to anyone as creator or founder is frowned on - if I search hard enough, I suspect I'll fan a rule against it
• Remove authors details everywhere - community ownership, you can link to GitHub stats on your project to highlight the main contributors (just a link - let people follow the link to research for themselves)
• https://hub.dagworks.io/docs/#checklist-for-new-dataflows in contribute.py - should have an Apache Hamilton hosted link and Apache Hamilton branding
• Generally, too many mentions of Hamilton and not enough of Apache Hamilton
• The whole contrib release is problematic - these modules should be given names and no longer have author names or org names as the names of the directories or in authors files

[Dev-iL]

Remove authors details everywhere - community ownership, you can link to GitHub stats on your project to highlight the main contributors (just a link - let people follow the link to research for themselves)

These stats are a bit off because there's no consistency in how multi-commit PRs are merged: sometimes as-is (which counts as N commits in the stats), and sometimes with a merge commit (which counts as 1 commit).

...so an unrelated discussion that we should likely have at some point.

[skrawcz]

Contrib is contributions -- that's the intent. We can rephrase -- but it's supposed to be split between official and user contributed ones.

And I need a domain to host it under.