You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Check Vincent's okay before uploading bodemlagen report. Agreed.
Provide a mask for which the bodemlagen here provide better information than REGISII. We need to know where to use bodemlagen_pwn_2024 and where REGIS. With the current provided data we cannot make the distinction whether a layer is knowingly missing or that it falls outside the region of interest. Bergen and Koster mask marks where the layer is not present within the study area.
Check bodemlagen_pwn_regis_koppeltabel.
Merging of DS21 and DS21_0. No. In the Eem formatie are two clay layers present. S21_0 will be renamed to S20, is located in the top of the Eem formatie. Then 20m sand before the top of the S21. Koppeltabel aanpassen: EEK1 (of BEk1/2?)=S20 and EEK2=S21 -> Vincent doet de check. W21 opsplitsen in W20 en W21 en koppeltabel daarop aanpassen.
Only seem to have looked at aquitards. What needs to be done for the aquifers? Vincent looks at botms af Bergen aquifers.
Check basis aquitards for Bergen region is translated to top aquitards? Vincent's product only contains top of aquitards.
bodemlagen_pwn_nhdz/v1.0.0/Bodemparams/Cwaarden_aquitards/DWAT_Boringen_Selectie.shp contains elevations and resistivities not included in the interpolation points.